Fort Worth, Texas · Tarrant
Architecture · Strategy · Daily code
When your team doesn't have a technical partner.
You're on your third freelancer this year. The first one disappeared mid-sprint. The second one built something that technically works but nobody can maintain. Now you're onboarding someone new again, explaining the same business logic for the third time, watching them nod along while you wonder if they actually get it.
You're in a meeting and someone asks "can we add this feature by Q2?" and you have no idea. You can't evaluate timelines, you can't assess tradeoffs, and the person you're paying to know these things gives you a different answer every time.
Your app goes down on a Saturday night. You text your developer. No response for 6 hours. When they finally reply, they need another 4 hours to figure out what broke because they don't remember how the system fits together. You're sitting at dinner calculating revenue lost per minute.
The real problem isn't that you need a developer. And it's not that you need a CTO. It's that the role you actually need doesn't fit standard job descriptions — you need someone who thinks at the executive level but executes at the individual contributor level, every single day.
Half the "fractional CTOs" out there are advisors in a fancy hat — Notion docs, Slack opinions, zero pull requests. That isn't the job.
Not a strategy doc, not a Notion page — production code, in your repo, tested and deployed. The lead engineer you hire should be able to unblock the team by shipping, not just advising on Slack.
Database choice, auth pattern, deployment pipeline, monitoring, cost structure. Founders without a technical partner end up with whatever their first contractor felt like using — and pay for it later.
Reviews contractor output, interviews engineering hires, calls the BS when a vendor is overcharging, and makes sure everyone on your team is set up to succeed.
When a VC asks "who's your technical lead?" on a fundraising call, you need a name, a LinkedIn, and a track record — not a contractor nobody knows. An embedded lead engineer closes that gap without the full-time equity grant.
The "embedded" part means I work across 3 clients at a time — so Fort Worth founders get senior engineering judgment at a fraction of the cost of a full-time hire. The "still writes the code" part is what separates this from advisory roles.
About Seth
I started writing code at 15. Since then I've been engineer #1, CTO, lead architect, and the technical backbone of startup after startup — watching brilliant ideas die from bad engineering and great engineering die from bad business. I've seen every way it goes wrong.
I've hand-rolled neural networks in C when there were no good Python libraries, shoved terabytes of data through Postgres every hour without melting the cluster, designed custom BLE protocols for wearable hardware, built CAD-integrated configurators that drove real CNC machines, shipped computer vision systems that ran on off-the-shelf cameras, and stood up billing/auth/ops infrastructure more times than I can count.
Now I embed in small teams as the lead engineer. I own the architecture, the strategy, and the code itself. Not as a consultant who advises and leaves — as a partner who shows up every day and builds.
No discovery calls that turn into sales pitches. No 30-slide decks. Here's what happens when a Fort Worth founder reaches out:
I join your team. Read every line of code. Understand the business, the product, the people.
Identify what's working, what needs attention, what's urgent. Give you a straight answer about where things stand.
Take full ownership of the technical stack. Architecture, infrastructure, daily development. It's mine now.
Ship features. Solve problems. Make executive calls AND write production code — every single day.
Grow the technical foundation as your business grows. The code is yours from day one — no lock-in, ever.
One engineer. Your entire technical stack. Architecture, strategy, and daily code — available to Fort Worth founders and teams.
Architecture, strategy, and daily code — one person, fully embedded
I join your team as the lead engineer. I own the technical vision, make the architectural calls, and write production code every single day. No management layers, no handoffs, no disappearing acts.
Twenty startups. Every flavor of failure and quiet success. Here are a few lessons I bring to every Fort Worth engagement:
Worked at a crowdfunding startup where the one rock-star engineer used the attention to land a FAANG job — and left a gaping hole nobody could fill. The lesson: document relentlessly, and never let one person become a single point of failure.
Had a sales rep "crush" their goals by selling features the company didn't actually have. Customers churned right after commission got paid. The lesson: retention and engagement metrics tell the truth; booking numbers often don't.
Shipped a "small" change on a Friday afternoon that took down an e-commerce site for launch weekend, because I tested in Firefox and forgot about IE. The lesson: test like a user, not like a developer.
Hired a developer who aced every technical quiz, then turned out not to know how to code — they'd been hoping to figure it out before anyone noticed. The lesson: conversational interviews about real past decisions beat whiteboard gotchas every time.
These aren't hypotheticals. Each one cost a real company real money — so your Fort Worth startup doesn't have to re-learn them.
Fort Worth, Texas · Tarrant · Major Metro
Fort Worth has a distinct startup identity from Dallas — aerospace (Lockheed, Bell, Raytheon-adjacent), logistics (BNSF, AllianceTexas), and a growing industrial SaaS scene. The dominant culture is industry-first, not tech-first, which tends to produce a very specific kind of founder: someone with deep operational credibility who left a large company to build a tool the company wouldn't.
What I see most often in Fort Worth: a founder who spotted an inefficiency in aerospace supply-chain or rail logistics, built a v1 with a local consulting shop, and now needs a real technical partner to make the thing scale. The product instinct is usually right. The engineering foundation is usually a contractor-built mess that wasn't designed for the second customer.
<built-in method copy of dict object at 0x7f649950e640>
The companies I take on in Fort Worth tend to cluster around aerospace, logistics, industrial SaaS — though I've delivered engagements across nearly every flavor of Texas startup. What they have in common: a founder who needs someone they can trust to make technical calls without having to double-check every decision.
Remote-first engagements work across all of Texas. Some of the other Tarrant cities I work with:
Where the actual work in Fort Worth happens — and where founders most often need a senior technical partner who already speaks the domain.
Lockheed Fort Worth, Bell Textron, and the cluster of suppliers feeding both. Dual-use tech startups, training simulation, hardware-adjacent SaaS.
BNSF, AllianceTexas, and a long industrial corridor. Logistics-tech founders here usually come from inside the industry and need a partner who already speaks rail, freight, or supply-chain.
B2B software for energy services, utilities, and family-owned industrial businesses — under-served verticals where domain expertise beats technical novelty.
From the field
Fort Worth founders most often come out of an aerospace or logistics company — they spotted a gap their employer wouldn't fix and left to build it. The technical foundation tends to be ad-hoc, often starting as Excel plus a small consulting build, which works for the first three customers and breaks at the fourth. The work is usually about replacing the consultancy build with something a real engineering team can extend without rebuilding it again.
Yes — Fort Worth is part of the DFW rotation. Same Houston-to-DFW drive applies (four hours by car, 40 minutes by air), and most Fort Worth on-sites are bundled with Dallas trips when the calendar lines up.
With freelancers you're already dependent on someone with zero commitment to your business. I embed specifically to stay. The 3-month minimum exists so we both take the partnership seriously. And everything I build is yours from day one — code, documentation, all of it.
I've done exactly this for 20+ startups over 27 years. I know what one senior engineer can handle — and I know when to say "we need help here." One person who owns everything actually moves faster than a team of specialists coordinating through Jira tickets.
I'm primarily remote-first, which means I can usually start faster. For Fort Worth and other Texas clients, on-site visits are possible when they genuinely move the needle — not for meetings that could've been a Slack message.
The 3-month minimum exists so we both take the engagement seriously and have real time to ship. After that, we can wrap at the end of any month up to the 6-month maximum. You keep all the code and documentation.
$15,000/month. 3-month minimum, 6-month maximum. No hourly billing, no tiered packages, no upsells. I only take on 3 clients at a time — if you want a seat, let's talk and we'll see if the fit is right.
Absolutely, yes. Your legacy code is haunted by the disembodied spirits of junior developers who copy-pasted from Stack Overflow without understanding what they were doing. Let's clear them out.
One meeting. No pitch deck, no proposals. Just a conversation about what you need and whether I'm the right fit.
Roster limited to 3 clients
Pick a time that works. No sales pitch — just a straight conversation about your team and your stack.
Book a CallNo commitment. 20 minutes. Straight answers.
tl;dr
I embed in your team as the lead engineer. I own the architecture, the strategy, and the code. One person who thinks like a CTO and ships like a senior engineer — serving Fort Worth and all of Texas.
Let's Talk About Your TeamNo commitment. 20 minutes. Straight answers.